Contrition

Ok. I have just discovered that my last post did NOT depict my first non-veg dinner, but some strange cat-choking situation I’d saved from a hilarious book I found once. I truly do apologize for today’s mistaken posts. I do not seem to be able to get the hang of this stupid computer. I think today’s experiment in food and computers has convinced me that (a) my good old typewriter is the best idea for me and (b) I am going back to being a vegetarian.

Oh, and I’m going to stick to what I know best, which seems to be writing. At least, I do that better than computer stuff. In light of that, I’m offering my contrition here, and the suggestion that you let me redeem myself in your eyes by reading my novel SWEET.

I swear I’ve got the right photo this time–it’s the beautiful cover, designed by CB Messer.

You can get your copy of SWEET at Amazon, major bookstores everywhere, or (the best place) Interlude Press’ website, here: http://store.interludepress.com/collections/ebooks/products/sweet-by-alysia-constantine-multi-format-ebook

OMG!!!!

This is getting really embarrassing! I messed up that last post AGAIN! I am really starting to feel so horrible about this! Please disregard that last post I made. After 26 years, I am giving up being a vegetarian. I tried to post a picture of my first dinner as a non-veg, but I accidentally posted a picture of one of my dogs looking fly. So now, I am posting a picture of my first dinner as a non-vegetarian in 26 years.

IMG_0943

Oops!

I sincerely apologize to Rihanna, that guitar chord app, and everyone who saw that last post. It was the result of a terribly unfortunate computer glitch.

I am going to try this again. I would like to announce that, after 26 years, I am giving up being a vegetarian. Picture of my first dinner as a non-veg!

ryelounging

AGAIN? Is this a JOKE?

Ok, I owe the Internet some big apologies. My numerous attempts at posting my announcement today have failed badly. I’ve checked online resources, and can find no explanation for why the wrong photo keeps posting with my announcement. Once more, I shall try this announcement again:

I would like to announce that, after 26 years as a vegetarian, I am giving up “rabbit food” and eating “normal person food.” Please ignore my past statements about the moral, ethical, environmental, and economic reasons for being a vegetarian.

And please ignore my previous posts about this today–something is definitely wrong with my computer, and it keeps attaching the wrong photograph.  THIS post is, however, correct. I’ve included a photograph of what I ate for lunch today:

bitch better have money

Social Media Fails

Many people have said that “old” people (I’m 45, geez! It’s not like I’m 46 or something!) should stay away from social media, or that women can’t work technology, or that half-Greek half-Irish middle-aged gay lady writer-professors are usually unskilled at computer and should stick to making Fruit Stripe Gum for the nation to enjoy (ok, I only heard that last one once, and it may have been a dream in which Andre the Giant and LeVar Burton were lecturing me, but still…).

I am beginning to believe this, as I have failed several times to tweet/post correctly today. Here is a brief history of these failures, which I openly and bravely admit:

 

 

1 glasses2 cobblestone penis3 fab fingers4 catsink5 dirtydogchew6hotdogs7 scissors7 urabbit

However, I am going to keep trying today, so keep your fingers crossed for me.

On Recognizing Privilege

I was just speaking with my partner about an upcoming overseas trip we’re planning (she is turning 40, and so has decreed that we are visiting Iceland this summer (I have no problem with that)).

More than a decade ago, back in PhD school, I was lucky enough to get a scholarship to a 2-week program in gender studies at the European University in Budapest. When the program was done, my partner flew over from the States and we took the Eurorail to visit Hungary, Vienna and Prague (this was in the days before the massive influx of US tourists, back before those places were considered de rigeur post-college walkabout spots for wealthy kids who’d gotten a European vacation as a gift for graduating… in MY day, our gift for graduating was a college degree and a lifetime of debt, okay?).

Anyway, my partner and I did this as cheaply as we could, staying in the sketchiest places, the kind one can only tolerate in one’s youth. I’m generally not a fussy or pretentious person. I had a huge meltdown, however, in Prague when we arrived at the hostel at which we were to stay and discovered a room likely last occupied by violent dinosaurs who not only ate flesh, but also carried numerous communicable diseases. They’d left… traces.

Apparently, my first words, upon walking into the room were, “Is that blood?”

My partner and I, reminiscing, were just arguing over whether that blood was on the floor and counter in the kitchenette or smeared all over the bathroom floor. (I admit, I may be mixing this memory with the one of sharing a hospital room with a slightly demented and in-pain woman who smeared her feces all over the walls of our shared bathroom.  I’m beginning to realize I’ve seen a lot of smearing in my day.)  In any case, there was blood, and it wasn’t mine and it wasn’t my partner’s.  Commence Episode 1 of Alysia Totally Losing Her Sh*t.

I was an Awful American. I stormed out of the hostel and into the streets of Wherever-We-Were, crying hysterically. I convinced my poor partner we needed to leave that place and rent a hotel room for the night instead, lest we be murdered in our sleep. Once we got the hotel room, I got upset again because there were two twin beds in the room instead of one full-sized one and, when we asked the desk clerk about it, she told us just to push the two beds together. I attributed this to the hotel’s homophobia. The desk clerk probably thought I was a prissy, Entitled American Witch. I have no argument against that; I think both assessments were probably true.

Now more than a decade later my partner and I are trying to plan a trip to celebrate her 40th birthday. She has always wanted to go to Iceland, so… we’re trying to plan a trip to Iceland in early summer.  I worry now about carrying all the medical supplies I will need (2 blood glucose test kits, a double supply of insulin for safety, insulin pump tubes & needles & reservoirs & batteries, extra syringes in case of pump failure, pre-filled syringes of MS drugs with ice-pack, extra prescriptions for emergencies,kitchen sink…); I worry about being hassled for being gay in public; I worry about being able to go to the places my love wants to go, since I stumble around with a cane and she enjoys hiking up mountains and other Sporty Person activities.

And I am fighting to balance the need to properly advocate for myself as a disabled lesbian and the need to recognize that mine is not the most dire situation—I want to remember my own privilege, even as I want to be clear about the ways that things can be tougher for disabled queers like me.  (Tougher than what? You might ask. I say: exactly.)

Here’s how I solve this dilemma for myself: my own pain and difficulty can be used to call attention to the pain and difficulty of others, rather than just to reify my own desire for comfort—even when my own pain or discomfort is so much less urgent than that of someone else. My own difficulties as a queer, disabled American woman abroad can serve a purpose: I am sensitive and aware in ways I might not have been were I more normatively-identified. And because I am first-world, because I am middle class and white, I get heard when I speak, when I know so many others don’t. It takes nothing away from my own experience of difficulty to recognize that other people experience pain and difficulty, too—in different, and sometimes more intractable or more severe, ways than I do. (Here I’m not even touching the tip of that iceberg—get it? a pre-Iceland metaphor—not even starting to talk about the ways in which I’m privileged enough to be able to take a 5-day vacation in Iceland with the person I love.)

To understand that I am privileged over many other people does not mean that I am ignoring the ways I am less privileged than others, too. Ensuring that everyone has what they need doesn’t have to feel like I’m neglecting my own needs.  Willingly advocating for giving up a little of one’s own privilege so that the gap between one’s own experience and that of others is lessened, well, that’s just humane, isn’t it? Human, even?  And it costs one so little.  (It’s a different thing when one is expected to take care of everyone else’s needs instead of one’s own; I was just speaking today with someone who’s a mom, and thus expected to subvert her own needs and desires in favor of others’—this strikes me as a uniquely different problem.)

My life should be a recognition of both my privilege and my disempowerment, so that I can be a fierce advocate for myself and for others. This is not to suggest that I ever want to stay in a place with blood smeared anywhere in it.  I’m 45 now, and just over it.  But next time, I probably won’t throw a First World Problems hissy fit about it, either.

I’m learning to find a balance, which is not easily done. And so much depends upon it (my own well-being, and the well-being of so many other people). I’m also trying to unlearn the Midwestern White Daughter of a Conservative Immigrant Behavior that’s been drilled into me since childhood: don’t make a fuss, don’t draw attention to yourself, always be meek and polite and agreeable, shame should be your default feeling. That kind of thinking is really convenient for those who are empowered never to consider the needs of others, or the ways in which their empowerment hurts others. It makes a nation of Stepford Wives, of which it’s probably good to be the king.

I shall never forget the experience of having a man on a crowded subway press against me in the throng and rub his crotch against my ass. Terrified, I slunk my way to a corner of the train car to get away from him, trying not to be noticed. I was so ashamed. A moment later, he’d moved on to a different victim, a young woman near the car’s entrance. I know he’d moved on because she started screaming profanity and making a fuss about him frotting on her. I’d been afraid to make any noise, assuming the train was a “frotternity” (get it?) and worrying about making a scene; what I learned was that HE looked like the bad person, not the girl yelling. I hope I never forget that lesson.)

Let me unlearn my training. Let me not be a nice girl anymore. Let me not be always and only agreeable. Let me not worry that someone will be “mad at me” for speaking or thinking or desiring, or let me worry and do it anyway. Let me not squish myself up into a painful little knot in an effort to take up less space in the world. Let me no longer keep to myself; let me not hide, but also let me not eclipse someone else in my efforts to be seen.

My body is ready, friends. Let there be blood.

Joy: Google It!

Here’s a fun rainy-day activity for kids: if you’re lucky enough to have internet access on rainy days (I go to the library for that), try a Google Image Search for “joy.”

Discuss.

By and large, what you will find is pictures of people (or silhouettes of people) leaping, arms up, into the air.  Usually against a sunset-lit sky.  Usually skinny, young people-silhouettes with flying hair.

My first question is: are such folks the only ones with access to joy?

That’s a good question, if I do say so myself. But it’s not the only question. My other question is related, but not the same: why do almost all of the depictions of “joy” involve physically-able bodies leaping into the air? Am I, Cane Lady who has probably not leapt into the air in more than 20 years and cannot raise my left arm past navel-height, missing something by not leaping with my arms in the air? Can joy be expressed by other bodies, in other ways? Can non-normative bodies experience joy? Can those bodies produce joy for others?

Why no pictures of animal companions? Or book-reading, or violin-playing? Or the tender dependency of children? Or cake?

Why no tasteful pictures of “disabled” folks enjoying sex or being sexy? Why no images of physically-disabled folk expressing joy in the ways that they might, without leaping? Why no wheelchair basketball, or a Cane Lady laughing her ass off, or a fat woman lovingly looking at her reflection in a mirror? Why no dependent children tenderly eating cake?

I’m not suggesting that apparently able-bodied, thin, “good hair”-having folk leaping around at sunset on a beach is NOT joyful. I’m sure it is, as long as you don’t land barefoot on a broken seashell or discarded sanitary napkin (I’m from New York City, friends, and it happens). I’m just suggesting that perhaps it’s time to expand our imaginaries to include other ways of being in the world, other models of Good and Beautiful, other ways of imagining joy.

The images “we” (culturally, as Americans, Canadians and western Europeans, at least) still associate with “joy” have to do, on their underbellies, with maintaining control. Fat bodies, female bodies, disabled bodies—all of those bodies threaten “us” precisely because they propose a different understanding of “self control.”  Sex and cake? Rewards for self-control, to be enjoyed responsibly after you’ve gotten off the elliptical machine and properly cleaned your hard, glistening, straight body.

This is about boundaries, and exceeding them or opening them up. Laughter—boistrous, real laughter—overruns a boundary. So does expressing anger, or shouting. So does peeing a little when you laugh or cry or sneeze (did you know that we say “bless you” in English when someone sneezes because a sneezing body is considered open to the entrance of evil spirits?). So does an orgasm (female bodies have also been thought to be open to the entrance of evil spirits).

Some bodies have greater access to these joyful liberties than others (I’ve gotten dirty looks for shouting at a roller derby match, while the men who dirty-looked shouted at the wheeling women to their hearts’ content). That’s political. Joy is political.

I want a picture of a fat, physically-disabled woman tenderly watching herself in the mirror as she lovingly eats cake.  I want THAT on that Google Image Search for “joy.”

Frosting everywhere. Cake all smeared, colors blending and smeared over flesh, ample body enjoying its excess of pleasure, absolutely still in a moment of sheer self-adoration, eyes locked on her own reflected eyes, ouroboros and totally focused on herself, her own needs. I want that image shimmering with unfettered glee. And I want Google to call it “joy.”

Regarding the [fat] Pain of [fat] Others

Regarding the Pain of Others

I have borrowed this title from Susan Sontag’s brilliant essay about war and violence. I borrowed it because I like the title, not because I am necessarily trying to compare my subject with war.

I want to write today about Fat Shaming, the general Intolerance of Disabled and Different Bodies, and General Shittiness in America.  (It is not that I believe this phenomenon is unique to the United States; rather, it is that I have little basis on which to speak about other cultures than my own.)

I am fat, and I am disabled (by Multiple Sclerosis and other chronic diseases, such that I walk wobbly with a cane). These two facts are not related in the way people imagine (that the fat caused the other conditions); if anything, these other conditions have encouraged the fatness that was already my genetic predisposition because I’m fairly unable to diet and exercise like a proper 1980s Aerobics Maniac with a thong excersuit up my butt and a side pony tail (I’m writing about the image, folks, not actual people here).  But, really, it doesn’t matter why I am fat to the jerks on the street, and it doesn’t matter for my point, either; I appear to be working hard to exonerate myself of the Great Shame that is being a Too-Fat Woman, and that’s counter-productive.  If the fat is in your boobs or lips, that is fine (so long as you use that for the greater (straighter) good), but if it collects in other, less heterosexually-useful areas, God help you.  Actually, to hear some folks tell it, God hates Fats as much as God hates Fags, so God probably won’t help you.  After all, Greed and Sloth are mortal sins, and we all know that fatness is the clearest expression of Greed and Sloth (the movies tell us so).

Forgive me; I’m cranky and thus sarcastic. What spurred me today was a woman waiting in a medical treatment waiting room loudly lecturing the rest of us about Fat Adults being lazy and making Fat Children because you let them eat whatever they want, and “FatfatfatfatfatEVILfatfatfatPIECEOFCRAPI’MSOSUPERIORTOALLYOUfatties.”  (I may have tuned out at some point, so my quotation may be inaccurate, but that was the gist of it.)

The whole waiting room was silent, though I made have loudly grumbled about bigots and fat-shaming and stupidity, and some folks may have smiled and side-eyed me conspiratorially. 

I may have also fantasized about whacking this idiot with my cane, or shouting her down, or insulting her somehow. I thought of so many smug come-backs I might hurl at her. And let’s not call me virtuous for holding back; let’s acknowledge that I had a small epiphany. This asshole was probably speaking loudly about this because she needed to. Maybe she needed to feel better than someone else; maybe she was angry about something and lashing out; maybe she was scared (she was, after all, in the waiting room of an MRI place); maybe she was demented. It’s also possible she’s just a really horrible person, but the point is that I didn’t know, and in those situations, it’s best to give people the benefit of the doubt, I think.  Kindness in all things, friends, is hard but most often best.

Thing is, it’s still culturally ok to shame people for being fat. It’s also okay to be shitty about disability.  It’s still okay to knock a “Cane Lady” (as I refer to myself) out of the way to get a seat on the subway, or carve “Citizen Cane” into the snow on my car’s windshield because you think it’s funny (granted, it IS) and don’t imagine how it might make someone like me feel targeted or vulnerable. It’s still okay to “fag-shame,” too—especially for those among us who are Men-Too-Feminine or Women-Too-Butch or just Too Dang Gay to Function.  (I’m not even getting into all the other stupidities that are condoned, like racism and sexism…) Point is, shut up.

My body is not your business. Nobody’s body and nobody’s personhood is your business, unless you are invited by that person to consider it so.

And this is where, I think, intersectionality happens: there maybe be different results, or different instigating factors, but at the base of it, women, disabled people, LGBTQ folk, colored folk, immigrants, fat folk–I’m going to get myself in trouble (with myself) if I try to list everyone here, because I will forget to include someone—we all share the similar problem of not being recognized as human (and thus the result of economic and social sanctions).  Or, more properly, perhaps, not being recognized as AS human as other people get to be. 

There’s another point, too, that I just figured out today: operate with kindness.  Not in a turn-the-other cheek kind of way, and not out of the hope that the haters will suddenly see the light if a Fat Queer is nice to them, but because it would be nice to live in a kinder world, one in which we all recognize the value of other living things.  One in which we recognize that others have pain that may not be apparent to us, and though we can’t see it, we can treat it with care. One in which my value doesn’t depend upon taking something away from someone else.

A world in which all of us are afforded a little dignity and compassion.

Except fat chicks.  No fat chicks.